ABSTRACT
Prior research indicates that couples who cope with chronic illness from a relational "we" orientation experience more positive outcomes than couples that cope individually; however, little prior research identifies clinical processes that promote reciprocity or how societal gender processes are involved. This grounded theory analysis of 25 videotaped therapy sessions with six heterosexual couples coping with chronic liver disease (LD) used a feminist-informed relational lens to focus on the clinical processes involved in shifting from an individual to a relational orientation. Findings identified three contextual barriers to attaining a "we orientation": (a) autonomy discourse, (b) illness-related power, and (c) gendered power. Analysis detailed therapist actions that decreased the impact of barriers to reciprocity and fostered relational coping. Clinical implications attend to complex intersections among gender, caregiving, and contextual barriers to reciprocity.
Investigaciones anteriores indican que las parejas que hacen frente a una enfermedad crónica desde una orientación relacional basada en el "nosotros" tienen resultados más positivos que las parejas que la enfrentan individualmente; sin embargo, existen escasas investigaciones previas que identifiquen los procesos clínicos que promueven la reciprocidad o la manera en la que están implicados los procesos de género social. Este análisis de teoría fundamentada de 25 sesiones de terapia videograbadas con seis parejas heterosexuales que enfrentan una enfermedad hepática crónica utilizó una óptica relacional fundamentada en el feminismo para centrarse en los procesos clínicos relacionados con el paso de una orientación individual a una relacional. Los hallazgos identificaron tres obstáculos contextuales para lograr una "orientación basada en el nosotros": (a) el discurso de autonomía, (b) el poder relacionado con la enfermedad, y (c) el poder asociado al género. El análisis detalló las medidas del terapeuta que redujeron el efecto de los obstáculos para la reciprocidad y fomentaron el afrontamiento relacional. Las implicancias clínicas tratan de las intersecciones complejas entre el género, el cuidado y los obstáculos contextuales para la reciprocidad.
Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Couples Therapy/methods , Liver Diseases/psychology , Spouses/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Chronic Disease , Empowerment , Female , Grounded Theory , Heterosexuality/psychology , Humans , Male , Personal Autonomy , Qualitative Research , Sex Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Female heart patients are underdiagnosed and undertreated. The purpose of this qualitative meta-data-analysis was to explain how societal expectations related to gender and the treatment environment influence women's experiences and can inform optimal care. The authors used grounded theory methodology and a social constructionist gender lens to analyze 43 studies (1993-2012) of women's experiences of heart disease. The analysis illustrates how social expectations within both medical and relational contexts led to women experiencing barriers to diagnosis and treatment and inadvertent minimization of their experience and knowledge. Women's descriptions of their experiences suggest three kinds of health care strategies that have the potential to increase women's engagement with heart disease treatment and rehabilitation: (a) support give and take in relational connections, (b) identify and acknowledge unique health-promoting behavior, and (c) focus on empowerment. These findings have interdisciplinary implications for practice with women with heart disease.
Subject(s)
Gender Identity , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/psychology , Qualitative Research , Women's Health , Adaptation, Psychological , Environment , Female , Health Promotion , Heart Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Power, Psychological , Social EnvironmentABSTRACT
Medical family therapy (MedFT) is a growing area of interest within the field of marriage and family therapy. Its practice necessitates a shift from conventional family therapy practices to include diverse ways of providing care. Literature highlights approaches for patients with specific illnesses and for particular healthcare contexts. Less is understood about frameworks for treating patients with different illnesses across settings. Contributing to the growing discourse surrounding MedFT, we present a role-based practice framework that identifies six consistent roles, Therapist, Brief Interventionist, Health Coach, Patient Advocate, Consultant to Health Professionals, and Trainer specific tasks associated with each. We describe the skills needed to perform each role and describe how we move fluidly between roles to provide comprehensive care.
